@Pleasing-Hemp
#15,707320x153fd6dbce3bc766746d7e2ffb8e826014e7cb70
Composite trader rating.
0 to 100.
Smart Score aggregates PnL consistency, win rate, risk management, diversification, timing patterns, and trading behavior into a single 0‑100 score. Combined with bot detection that analyzes trade timing gaps, order patterns, and execution speed.
Score Components
Summary
Pleasing-Hemp is a moderately active trader on Polymarket, with 18,985 trades across 771 markets over 23 days. Ranked #15,707 globally by net PnL, they have generated $8,065.37 in profit from a total volume of $616,316. Despite this positive overall PnL, their Smart Score is below average at 32/100, reflecting some weaknesses in risk-adjusted performance. Their Sharpe Ratio is negative at -0.47, indicating volatility and unfavorable returns relative to risk.
This trader focuses heavily on weather markets, which make up 61% of their activity. Pleasing-Hemp exhibits an automated trading style, supported by a high Bot Score of 75/100 and badges like "Bot" and "DCA Master." Their win rate of 61.4% suggests consistent small gains, but the low profit factor of 0.13 implies many trades have low profitability relative to losses. They tend to hold positions briefly, evidenced by a max drawdown duration of zero days, and have a low sell percentage of 11%, hinting at a preference for automated entries and limited manual exits.
Pleasing-Hemp’s strengths lie in their ability to maintain an upward equity trend and capitalize on short-term opportunities, especially in weather markets. However, the negative Sharpe Ratio and low profit factor highlight risks in their strategy’s sustainability and risk management. Their reliance on automation may also expose them to systemic errors during volatile events. Overall, while their approach yields steady profits, further refinement could improve long-term robustness on Polymarket.
Badges
6Categories
4Overview
#1Periods
#2PnL Analysis
#3Top Winners
Top Losers
Risk Metrics
#4Behavior Analysis
#5Bot Detection
#67 indicators analyzed
Timing Patterns
#7Peak hour: 12:00 UTC
DCA Analysis
#8289 entries
384 entries
472 entries
508 entries
533 entries
626 entries
145 entries
Price Levels
#9City Stats
#10YES bias: 47%
Bracket Analysis
#11Single bracket
436 brackets
514 brackets
539 brackets
556 brackets
562 brackets
563 brackets
0 brackets
Sessions
#12Equity Curve
#13Faded bars = markets ending in the future (PnL from early exits)